Quel giorno, quel 13 aprile, rimarrà nella mia memoria per tanti motivi, ma specialmente per uno: quel 13 aprile si è materializzata la profezia che avevo elaborato ma in cui non volevo credere. Una tesi sulla letteratura elettronica che ovviamente hai intenzione di presentare al computer. “Il computer non funzionerà, lo so.” Ma cosa dici, tutte suggestioni.

E invece: niente. Zero connessione internet, nessun tecnico nei paraggi che potesse dare una mano, nessuno e niente di niente che potesse salvare la situazione se non un po’ di sana sfacciataggine e di salutare parlantina. E disegnare e far vedere con le parole quello che dovrebbe essere fatto di bit e 0/1. Una beffa del destino? Forse.

Forse era un modo per mettermi alla prova, e dimostrare che anche se la tecnologia aiuta e può essere una risorsa eccezionale, qualche volta decide di incepparsi, e a quel punto non c’è altro da fare che ricorrere alle risorse primarie del nostro essere umani. Aprire la bocca.

Forse, piuttosto, era solo sfortuna. Quella tenera sfortuna che non è proprio sfortuna, è un piccolo ostacolo che ti si para davanti per darti un po’ fastidio e per far sì che tu lo chiami sfortuna, giusto per dare la colpa a qualcuno che non sia la tua ansia che non ti ha fatto controllare per tempo se tutto fosse apposto, o la tua fretta di uscire di casa che non ti ha fatto prendere il tuo computer. O forse era lì per marcare quel giorno in maniera indelebile. Così per sempre ti ricorderai di quando ti sei laureata, con una tesi sulla letteratura elettronica, e il computer, di tutta risposta, non funzionava.

A couple of months ago the University of Bergen hosted the Seminar on Electronic Literature Communities. People involved in the field took part in the conference whose main topic, as the title suggests, was the analysis of the way in which electronic literature and new technologies in general are able to build communities around them.

Many aspects of this social and cultural phenomenon were examined. Scott Rettberg, cofounder of the Electronic Literature Organization and an associate professor of digital culture at the University of Bergen, was the coordinator of the conference and I think that the program he and his collaborators developed was pretty interesting. Not only were there well-known experts of electronic literature, such as Nick Montfort or Serge Bouchardon, but also scholars either from countries were electronic literature is developing nowadays or from other fields that somehow are connected with it.

Here you can find all the videos from the conference, but I’d like to recommend you some of them:

• Supercritical creativity, a talk by Mark Berry: Turing and Tarde, or how your mind can create a nuclear creative reaction, especially when inserted in a community. Berry starts form Turing’s idea of a supercritical mind, which is kind  of curious. I’ll try to explain it as clearly as I can. So, let’s say you have a certain mass that, if hit by a neutron, can cause a powerful nuclear chain reaction. We call “supercritical” a mass that is big enough to start this reaction. Now, let’s substitute the mass with a mind and the neutron with an idea. If the mind is supercritical, when hit by an idea it “may give rise to a whole theory consisting of secondary, tertiary and more remote ideas”. Similarly, is the mind is “subcritical” – and Turing says that animals, for instance, have a subcritical mind – no reaction happens. Given this, his main point is: how can creativity be thought in terms of super and subcritical mass? In other words, are there particular conditions under which creativity is more enhanced and promoted than others? Moving to the ideas of the French sociologist Gabriel Tarde, Berry states that one a mind is inserted in a community, its creativity is somehow turned on by living in an active and lively context. I think this is a good introduction to the conference because it explains the basic principle that drives it: when there is a community, being it real or virtual, minds are prompted to think more productively and creatively.
• The ELo and US Electronic Literature in the 2000s: Scott Rettberg talks about how the ELO was born and how electronic literature has developed since then in the US. Nobody better than him could have given a talk about the topic. It is interesting to see his notes back to when the ELO was just an idea. It was the hypertext era of electronic literature when the first courses in hypertext writing were coming out.
• Hypertext Fiction in the 1980s and 1990s, a talk by Jill Walker Rettberg: [I am really impressed by his child, he is so quiet!] this insight into the first period of electronic literature, the hypertext era as I said before, is clear, simple and effective. I am having a hard time drawing a sort of timeline on the history of electronic literature but this talk has been really useful to understand the dynamics of how it was born and you realize how important it was to have some communities that acted like nests from which the spreading of electronic literature started (creativity and community seem to rhyme pretty well).
• Electronic Literature Publishing in Europe: Sample Cases from Italy: among the various talks about “national” communities of electronic literature given at the conference, this one is particularly dear to me for obvious reasons. Still, I hope that even though the actual situation of electronic literature in Italy is quite bad — as almost nobody knows anything about it — I am glad to hear that someone is interested in developing it, and I would proudly add myself to the list of people mentioned by Giovanna di Rosario.

I really liked the idea of focusing a conference on the relation between creativity and community and on how collaboration can prove to be a basic requirement for giving birth to marvelous works both of art and of culture (think about wikipedia, for instance).

Speaking of this, there is another curious example I would like to talk about. Here in New York I am taking a class (well, the semester is over but I’m still here, so I speak using the present tense) of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, which is part of my exchange program between the University of Siena and the City University of New York. This course is taught by two professors, Steve Brier and Michael Mandiberg. Our syllabus includes not only many fundamental readings about pedagogy and technology, but also (and this is what makes the course so amazing) examples of how actually technology and pedagogy go together. One of the things that impressed me the most is this book, Collaborative Future. There are many reasons that make this book a unique one:

• Frist of all, is written using Booki, a free software that allows you writing books on the Internet.
• It is a book about collaboration and it was written by a group of people collaborating together (it sounds pretty obvious, but I think that it is coherent more than obvious, and I appreciate coherence).
• It was written according to special “rules”. I am using their words to describe what they did:

This book was first written over 5 days (Jan 18-22, 2010) during a Book Sprint in Berlin. 7 people (5 writers, 1 programmer and 1 facilitator) gathered to collaborate and produce a book in 5 days with no prior preparation and with the only guiding light being the title ‘Collaborative Futures’.

These collaborators were: Mushon Zer-Aviv, Michael Mandiberg, Mike Linksvayer, Marta Peirano, Alan Toner, Aleksandar Erkalovic (programmer) and Adam Hyde (facilitator).

The event was part of the 2010 transmediale festival <www.transmediale.de/en/collaborative-futures>. 200 copies were printed the same week through a local print on demand service and distributed at the festival in Berlin. 100 copies were printed in New York later that month.

This book was revised, partially rewritten, and added to over three days in June 2010 during a second book sprint in New York, NY, at the Eyebeam Center for Art & Technology as part of the show Re:Group Beyond Models of Consensus and presented in conjunction with Not An Alternative and Upgrade NYC. [. . .]

I find the idea of encouraging some people –who have never met each other before– to write a book together about collaboration, in a surprisingly short amount of time, absolutely fascinating. And if you give a look at the book, you will be even more fascinated. Trust me.